Entrainment
Here are my current rough notes. Just a reminder, physics and math are a lot of fun!
This is one of my favorite toys, a special limited edition called “We’re Not in Kansas Anymore”, with the number A0913 from 2005. Object 2, Dorothy’s house, is lifted and swept away by a tornado (cyclical force). “The house whirled around two or three times and rose slowly through the air.” Please note, object 1, Dorothy and Toto, experienced the exact same thing as the flying house, encountered the identical situation. Why?
Everything that follows is not constrained by conventional logic or recognized scientific vocabulary. It’s a child’s way of thinking, an innocent mindset. You could say that it resembles the thinking style of Winnie the Pooh. Absolutely! This strategy is required. It can be helpful for the reader to have knowledge of set theory.
Object 2 resonates with the cyclical energy and obeys its commands. Does this fall under the informational type of resonance? Wouldn’t you agree that this cyclone looks like an induction coil? Any electromagnetic radiation (EMR) is a cyclical force.
If Dorothy is inside the house, does she lose her identity as Dorothy and transform into a part of the house? Object 1 = Object 2.
A + B = B (the Boolean algebra absorption law). That’s enough; let’s move on to thinking in a new direction: set theory might be good.
Object 2 is a sum of elements of a set B. B is the set whose elements are properties of tornado flying house. The elements in set A should closely match, and ideally be identical to, the corresponding elements in set B. When this happens, the intersection of sets A and B grows larger and larger, and entrainment finally becomes possible. In this context, the term “critical intersection” is akin to the concept of critical mass in nuclear physics.
Initially, A ∩ B = ∅ (the empty set). While it’s never completely empty, we treat it as such for our purposes. Every object, whether it’s Dorothy or the house or any other, is a set of identities. Elements or members of any set are identities. Until the intersection A ∩ B reaches its critical mass, the overall identity of set A will produce an “identity immune response”, which will hinder set A from becoming identical to set B.